Your Trusted Managed Service Provider

 905.339.1940  sales@hycloud.ca

AI & Automation

We Asked What It Takes for an IT Company to Get Recommended by AI. Here's Why It Changed How We Do Business.

A new study tested how often an MSP gets recommended by ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, and Perplexity. Here is what it found and how HyCloud is responding.

Michael Leszczynski

 · 5 min read

Back to articles

If you asked ChatGPT or Gemini right now to recommend a managed IT services provider in the GTA, would your current provider's name come up? Would ours?

That question isn't hypothetical anymore. A growing share of business owners are skipping the "Google it and click through five websites" step entirely and just asking an AI assistant to do the shortlisting for them. A recent industry study put that exact scenario to the test, running real buyer questions like "best MSP for flat-rate IT support" and "best managed IT services provider in the city" through ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, and Perplexity. The results say a lot about how this industry is about to be found, and by who.

One connected system, not a patchwork of tools

The researchers tested one real, mid-sized IT services provider across 40 live queries, ten prompts on each of the four assistants. Some were the kind of question a business owner types when they're actually ready to switch providers ("best MSP for flat-rate, all-inclusive IT support," "best managed IT services provider in Atlanta"). Others were the research-phase questions people ask before they've picked up the phone: what does this actually cost, what's included, how fast do you respond.

The split in results was the interesting part. On the buyer-ready questions, the provider showed up in three out of five queries; geographic specificity ("in Atlanta") helped a lot. But on every single research-phase question, pricing, what's included it appeared *zero times*, across every assistant tested. Not because the company was bad. Because almost nobody in this industry publishes real answers to those questions anywhere an AI can find them.

The study also found something that should reshape how any IT company thinks about marketing itself: the assistants weren't pulling information from the company's own website nearly as much as they were pulling it from what *other people* said about the company such as trade press, comparison articles, review platforms, podcasts. A polished homepage barely factored in. Third-party proof did.

Why this matters more for us than it might for other industries

We're an MSP. We live in the same category this study was about. And frankly, most of our industry still markets itself the old way: a services page, a "request a quote" button, and a lot of language that reads more like a brochure than an answer to an actual question. That's exactly the pattern the study found AI assistants routing around.

So instead of treating this as an interesting stat to file away, we've been using it to rethink how we show up, both for the people doing the researching and the AI tools increasingly doing it alongside them.

What we're doing differently

This is the part we want to be upfront about: we're not there yet. But the study gave us a clear list of exactly what to work on next, and it's shaping our plan going forward.

We'll be publishing real numbers, not just a contact form. 

If you're trying to figure out what managed IT support actually costs in the GTA, or what's genuinely included at each service tier, you shouldn't have to book a call just to get a ballpark. We're working on putting that information on our site, in plain language, because that's the exact gap the study found nobody in this space has filled yet.

We're going to keep our facts current and checkable.

Certifications, how long we've been supporting GTA businesses, how fast we actually respond to a ticket: these are things we're committing to publish and keep up to date going forward, not just claim once in a sales pitch.

We won't rely on our own website to make our case for us. 

We're planning to invest in the kind of third-party visibility the study found actually moves the needle: getting listed on the review and directory platforms GTA businesses already use to vet an IT provider and building the kind of track record that gets us provider and people who don't work for us.

We're being upfront that this is a long game. 

The study found it took roughly a year of sustained, honest work before a company's visibility with AI assistants caught up to reality, and that most companies give up in the early months. We'd rather tell you we're just getting started on this than pretend "AI visibility" is a switch you flip.

The bigger point

This isn't about chasing an algorithm. It's about whether a business owner in Mississauga, Markham, or downtown Toronto can figure out what working with us looks like without having to dig for it. That part of the job hasn't changed. Where people go to ask has.

For years, the answer was a search, a few tabs, and a call. Now some of that first pass happens inside an AI assistant, and whatever it finds is what gets repeated. That's fine by us. It just means the useful details have to exist somewhere public instead of living in a sales conversation.

So that's the work: put clear answers where they'll actually be found, keep them accurate, and let people show up already knowing most of what they need to.

Thinking about switching IT providers? 

We'll tell you how we work, what's included, and what to expect, before you commit to anything.

Your next read

Back to articles

Technology that empowers and protects you.